Carbon Credits

Article 6 Registry: Tracking Cross-Border Carbon Units

An Article 6 registry records mitigation units a host country has authorised for international transfer, along with their use.

Article 6 registry is a national or international records system that tracks mitigation units authorised by a host country for international transfer, including their issuance, transfer, and eventual use or cancellation. It belongs to the field of Carbon Credits, where careful definitions shape how credits are issued, compared, traded, and retired.

A host country authorises specific units for international transfer and records them in its registry. When the units are transferred, the registry reflects the movement and the corresponding adjustment is applied to national accounts. The registry also records when a unit is used, cancelled or returned, so the same unit cannot be claimed twice. Because the registry sits inside government machinery, access and reporting differ from country to country, and buyers often rely on intermediaries to confirm that an entry exists and matches the contract.

For a buyer, the registry entry is the closest thing to proof that the host country has given up the right to count the reduction. That is what separates an Article 6 unit from a voluntary credit, and it is the first document an auditor will ask to see before accepting a claim. Where the entry cannot be located, the transfer should be treated as unconfirmed. Getting Article 6 registry right is not a semantic exercise; it decides whether climate claims hold up to scrutiny and whether capital reaches credible work.

Practical experience with Article 6 registry tends to reward patience and discipline: the organisations that document their assumptions, keep an audit trail, and revisit their methods are the ones that keep credibility when questions are asked.

Registry quality and interoperability vary between countries, and a unit can be authorised more than once if controls are weak. Gaps in reporting also make it hard for an outside buyer to confirm that a corresponding adjustment was actually applied. Where registries are newly built, entries may be corrected or reversed after the fact, and a buyer has little practical way to challenge a host government's bookkeeping.

CarbonFi links each Article 6 credit in its marketplace to the authorisation and registry reference supplied by the host country, so the transfer trail is attached to the on-chain asset rather than kept in separate spreadsheets. CarbonFi approaches Article 6 registry by combining independent verification, a transparent registry, and open market rails, so that the concept translates into verifiable, auditable action rather than a marketing claim.

Key takeaways

  • The registry tracks authorised units, not all mitigation activity.
  • Transfers are mirrored by corresponding adjustments.
  • Cancellation records prevent reuse of the same unit.
  • Interoperability between national systems is uneven.

Frequently asked questions

Is an Article 6 registry the same as a voluntary registry?

No. It serves the Paris Agreement accounting system and tracks authorised international transfers, while voluntary registries issue credits for voluntary claims.

Can a project appear in both?

Not for the same units. A unit authorised for international transfer must be handled through the Article 6 records to avoid double counting.

Who operates the registry?

Typically the host country, with international oversight arrangements for units transferred under the centralised mechanism.

Related guides

Put this into practice with CarbonFi

CarbonFi combines AI-driven verification (Athlas Verity), an on-chain carbon registry, the marketplace and CarbonDEX, CAFI staking, and on-chain retirement certificates — so carbon stays traceable from project to retirement.